The CytoFLEX came to me as a 3 laser system including a 50mW 488nm laser, a 55mW 640nm I had the chance to spend about a month with the CytoFLEX and what follows are some of my thoughts about the key features, successes and failures of this instrument. At CYTO2014, Beckman Coulter revealed the re-branded instrument now called CytoFLEX. The acquisition was finalized in June 2014. It was pretty obvious the better known cytometer manufacturers would be taking a look at the company for a possible acquisition, and in April of 2014, Beckman Coulter announced they would purchase Xitogen for an undisclosed amount of money. zero install base, and zero user-generated data, CYTO 2013 came and went, and the buzz surrounding Xitogen died out. The Chinese company, headquartered in the Suzhou Industrial Park, set out to provide an alternative for Chinese researchers to acquire affordable flow cytometry instrumentation without having to deal with overpriced imported hardware from the big players. Before long, there was a buzz racing through the exhibit floor aisles of a flow cytometer starting at ~US$25,000 (1 laser, 2 colors). In 2013, an unknown company called Xitogen set up a booth at the annual CYTO conference. Up until now, I would have told you not to waste your time. Over the past few years, we've been inundated with small, inexpensive cytometers with the promise that they can perform as well as the big boys.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |